Imagen

OUR COLUMNIST MIKE COMMENTS ON TODAY’S ARTS CRITICISM:

‘Why does there so often seem to be an inverse relationship between the visual communicativeness of the work and the pseudo-intellectual exegesis that accompanies it? Why is such a lengthy explanation necessary for what should be comprehended visually? If you call a lemon a solar-hued citrusical cluster bomb of juice, pulp and seed, it’s still just a lemon isn’t it?’

FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER @RODRIGOCANETE