10351230_10153171795428327_5611366028503867856_n 10404146_10153171794723327_7761903793696244456_n 10383647_10153171794003327_8810753374847041877_n 10351070_10153171792453327_6203829808948440760_n 10350328_10153171789638327_5431991932279746143_n 10345830_10153171794448327_4414353640049229556_n 10300889_10153171792733327_6150499437486863311_n 10300889_10153171789903327_7789397265631880165_n 10288740_10153171792993327_1278241217240361774_n

According to The Times the Sao Paolo Biennale is dedicatee to: ‘the Gaza conflict, Brazilian narcos, US racism, abortion in Latinamerica, the crisis of late capitalism, transsexualism, wars, sexual abuse in the Catholic Church, drugs, cyberspying, etc’. According to the organisers the exhibition is dedicated ‘to discuss the world we live in through art’. As we can see, those are social and political topics that seem to be the source of artistic value for the majority of the pieces presented at the 31st edition of this Biennial and which will be on until December 7th.

The three questions we should ask ourselves are whether art should aim at discussing the world like that, whether that discussion is actually happen and in which conditions this discussion occurs. I am saying this because in recent art fairs, many works without aesthetic value have been presented which raise the issue of the boundary between topicality and work of art? From this point of view, it does not come as a surprise that the approach to debate this issues is not artistic but from the point of view of the media. It is as if form is not relevant anymore but the topic that infuse the concept which, paradoxically, is becoming less and less of a concept and more like a rhetorical vehicle of displacement. In my opinion that kind of art is frivolous and can only be functional to a view of the world that aims at trivialising issues in order to neutralise them. Has contemporary art become the realm of irresponsible awareness? J A T